Finally we come to this conclusion that the motive of Peripatetics and Avicenna in explaining the manner of God’s knowledge of particulars is more sacred to be accused of infidelity. But Ghazali didn’t notice that from Peripatetic’s viewpoint God cannot be the same as the changing eternal being. So it was better for them to accept God’s knowledge of particulars without any concern about the change. Les cours de philosophie islamique (felsefe-i din ici, slm felsefesi l). Ghazali had imagined that Peripatetic philosophers, especially Avicenna, fearing from penetration of change in the divine essence, have denied God’s knowledge of particulars while they themselves believe in a changing eternal being. La contrepartie en fut le ramnagement de la formation des imams dans des.
Explaining the views of Imam Muhammad al-Gazali and Avicenna in this regard, we try to make a comparison between their views and show that this accusation is originated from a misunderstanding by a person who claims that his religious concerns cause him to take up this position against the philosophers. Ghazali thinks that this kind of attitude toward the knowledge of God of particulars practically implies the denial of God’s knowledge and ends to infidelity. Buna gre, Dnyaya gelen her insan ftrat zere doar anlamndaki hadis insanlarn tabii, asl ve ftr dinlerinin slmiyet olduunu, daha sonra evre. His accusation goes directly to Avicenna’s view about the way God knows particulars. religious leader (imam) during the day, but he was alone during the long winter nights. In the same spirit, therefore, should each type of statement be received for it is the mark of an educated man to look for precision in each class of things just so far as the nature of the subject admits it is evidently equally foolish to accept probable reasoning from a mathematician and to demand from a rhetorician scientific proofs.Al-Ghazali, one of the most influential Muslim theologians, in his well known book, Tahafut al-Falasafeh, deals with the incoherent statements of philosophers about the problem of God’s knowledge of particulars. 144 Hilmi Ziya lken, Gazzali ve Felsefe, Ankara, Universitesi. slam alimlerinin ve dnrlerinin en nls olan ve ve laquo Hccetl slam ve raquo c/lakab ile anlan mam- Gazli, rann Ts ehrinin Gazal.
We must be content, then, in speaking of such subjects and with such premises to indicate the truth roughly and in outline, and in speaking about things which are only for the most part true and with premises of the same kind to reach conclusions that are no better. ark syleyiniz., orta a ile ilgili iki zellik syleyiniz., imam gazalinin bilgi gr hakknda bilgi veriniz., fkra anlat, ilk a ile ilgili bir. O ansiklopedik diye nitelendirilen ok ynl dnr tipinin hem en baarl hem de en verimli rnekleri arasnda yer alr. isimli eserin, Gazaliyi, felsefe dman ilan etmesi de rol oynamtr. Ebu Hmid Gazl, insanlk dnce tarihinin anahtar ahsiyetlerinden biridir.
And goods also give rise to a similar fluctuation because they bring harm to many people for before now men have been undone by reason of their wealth, and others by reason of their courage. Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, TURKEY. Now fine and just actions, which political science investigates, admit of much variety and fluctuation of opinion, so that they may be thought to exist only by convention, and not by nature. Our discussion will be adequate if it has as much clearness as the subject-matter admits of, for precision is not to be sought for alike in all discussions, any more than in all the products of the crafts. Dini, insann karakterini deitirecek kadar gl bir hakikatler sistemi olarak. lk dnem kelamclarnn Kuran' Grek Felsefesi nda okumalar 200 sene sonra bir fikir ihtilaline neden olacaktr (kbal, 2014b: 11). Nicomachean Ethics ISBN: 9786051703718 2020 Felsefe Arıstotle Anı Yayıncılık Din Felsefesi ve Temsilcileri 1.A - Alfred North Whitehead - Ayn zamanda Sre felsefesinin kurucusudur.
0 kommentar(er)
